What happened
Northern Mali had been in intermittent revolt since independence — Tuareg rebellions in 1962, 1990, 2006 — over a periphery the state never fully administered, developed or policed. Every settlement promised decentralisation and development; none delivered enough to end the cycle. What changed in 2011 was capability, not grievance: the collapse of Libya sent home thousands of Sahelian fighters with weapons, vehicles and combat experience. In January 2012 the MNLA — with Ansar Dine's jihadists riding alongside — attacked the northern garrisons and broke them, massacring captured soldiers at Aguelhok. In March, junior officers at Kati overthrew the government for failing the war; within ten days the three northern regional capitals fell, and on 6 April the MNLA declared the independent state of Azawad. By July its jihadist co-belligerents had thrown it out of every city it claimed.
The period covers
- Tuareg rebellions of 1962, 1990 and 2006 — grievance and unimplemented settlements
- A northern periphery the state never fully administered or developed
- Gaddafi's fall returns armed, experienced Malian Tuareg fighters
- MNLA rebellion from January 2012; Aguelhok massacre
- March 2012 coup at Kati collapses the state's response
- Declaration of Azawad, 6 April 2012 — recognised by no one
- Ansar Dine, AQIM and MUJAO expel the MNLA and take the northern cities
Key analytical point
The separatist uprising and the jihadist takeover were connected but not identical projects. They rebelled together and fought each other within months: the MNLA wanted a secular Azawad, the jihadists wanted religious rule over any territory at all. Conflating the two remains the most common analytical error about Mali — and the 2026 FLA–JNIM alignment makes keeping them distinct more important, not less.